Cómo leer un Certificado de Análisis (COA) en extractos de hongos: guía práctica para elegir calidad

How to Read a Certificate of Analysis (COA) on Mushroom Extracts: A Practical Guide to Choosing Quality

If a mushroom extract doesn't list its COA per batch, you don't really know what you're buying. A good COA ( certificate of analysis ) confirms three things: identity (it's the correct species), potency (how many β-glucans/triterpenes/key compounds are present), and safety (heavy metals, pesticides, and microbiology are within limits).
What to look for first? The COA must identify the batch , the analytical method used (e.g., HPLC for triterpenes in Reishi, enzymatic/megazyme, or HPLC for β-glucans), and the legal safety limits (EU/WHO).

Important : Two numbers rule the day for Reishi: % triterpenes and % β-glucans . For Lion's Mane, the answer is β-glucans + hericenones/erinacines profile (if the supplier quantifies it). If the COA only shows "total polysaccharides" without mentioning β-glucans, be suspicious.

What is a COA and why is it crucial?

A Certificate of Analysis is a document issued by an independent laboratory that verifies the identity, potency, and safety of a specific batch. Unlike a sales slip (generic promises), a COA is measurable proof : techniques, results, signatures, date, and batch number. In mushroom extracts, where products are mixed with mycelium, substrate, or fillers, the COA separates actual potency from marketing .

Identity: confirming that you are what you say you are

Search the COA:

  • Species and part used : Ganoderma lucidum (fruiting body), Hericium erinaceus (fruiting body).

  • Authenticity : Botanical/microscopic evidence or HPLC fingerprint typical of the species.

  • Traceability : date of analysis and laboratory with contact information.

Reasons for suspicion : generic species (“Ganoderma sp.”), or “mycelium + grain” without clarification.

Potency: How to interpret the active compounds

Reishi (Ganoderma lucidum)

  • Total triterpenes (measured by HPLC or validated colorimetric methods). These are differential markers of quality.

  • β-glucans : immunomodulatory fiber; best to report specifically β-(1→3)/(1→6)-D-glucans , not “total polysaccharides.”

  • Guideline ranges : There is no “universal minimum,” but a premium extract will typically declare clear values ​​of β-glucans and quantified triterpenes (not “trace amounts”). Batch consistency is key.

Lion's Mane (Hericium erinaceus)

  • β-glucans (enzymatic/HPLC method).

  • Hericenones/Erinacines : Few suppliers quantify them because they require specific methods; if they appear, it is a sign of excellence .

Tip : If the COA only says “polysaccharides 40–50%” without specifying β-glucans, it’s probably measuring starch or other inactive fractions. For Reishi, always ask for triterpenes ; for Hericium, β-glucans , and, if possible, neuroactive compounds.

Safety: Heavy Metals, Pesticides, and Microbiology

Requires these sections:

  • Heavy metals (ICP-MS) : Arsenic (As), Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Mercury (Hg) with values ​​below EU/WHO limits.

  • Pesticides : multi-residue screening (ideally by LC-MS/MS).

  • Microbiology : Salmonella absent; E. coli absent; molds/yeasts within GMP limits.

  • Others : PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) and mycotoxins where applicable.

Reasons for suspicion : "It delivers" without demonstrating method or values . "It delivers" must be accompanied by numbers and technique.

Analytical Methods: Why They Matter

The method determines reliability:

  • HPLC : ideal for triterpenes (Reishi) and specific profiles.

  • Enzymatic/HPLC : for β-glucans ; be careful with methods that confuse inactive polysaccharides.

  • ICP-MS : standard for heavy metals.

  • LC-MS/MS : pesticides and traces.
    A good COA names the method, the reference standard, and the limit of quantification.

How to detect "red flags" in 60 seconds

  1. Only total polysaccharides appear → not very useful information.

  2. No triterpenes in Reishi → key marker missing.

  3. There is no external laboratory or no method listed → little transparency.

  4. “Organic” without metal/pesticide testing → certification does not replace analysis .

Frequently asked questions.

  • What's a good % of β-glucans? It depends on the mushroom and the method. The important thing is that they are distinguishable from the total polysaccharides and that there is consistency from batch to batch .

  • Is 20:1 always better? No, the ratio is about performance, not potency . Potency = verified active ingredients .

  • COA from the supplier or the vendor? Better from an independent laboratory and

Case study: Quick reading of an “excellent” COA

  • Identity : “Ganoderma lucidum (fruiting body), Lot GL-2409, HPLC fingerprint”.

  • Potency : “β-glucans 28.5% (enzymatic), triterpenes 5.2% (HPLC)”.

  • Safety : “As <0.05 mg/kg, Pb <0.05 mg/kg, Cd <0.02 mg/kg, Hg <0.01 mg/kg (ICP-MS)”; "Salmonella: absent; E. coli: absent."

  • Methods : listed with quantification limits and accredited laboratory.

How Nualat fits in

Our policy is to always publish the COA and report key active compounds using appropriate methods (HPLC for triterpenes; enzymatic/HPLC for β-glucans; ICP-MS for metals). In addition, we trace species/parts ( fruiting body only) and maintain HACCP standards in processing. Transparency allows for objective comparison .

Buying by label is a gamble; buying by COA is a data-driven decision. If you want extracts that perform in the real world, ask for lab certificates. You can see ours here.

Back to blog